Vaccine injury trial in Germany: Attorney Ulbricht announces interim status

But in a recent article he warned that the system media presents an extremely one-sided picture in this regard. The lawyer is confident that the situation will change.

It’s not just doctors who shy away from treating vaccination victims: For lawyers loyal to the regime, vaccine injuries are also a hot topic that doesn’t fit the common narrative. Apart from the law firm of Joachim Caesar Preller, it is mainly the law firm Rogert & Ulbricht that takes on vaccine damage cases in Germany and represents those affected in court.

However, mainstream reporting leaves little hope for justice. Lawsuits are dismissed on flimsy grounds, and people with serious health problems are denied compensation because the benefits of vaccination allegedly outweigh the risks – a narrative that even the plaintiffs themselves use as counter-evidence. Can be used. They also ignore the failure of authorities like the EMA and PEI, which relied on manufacturers’ information and predicted critical quality controls.

However, attorney Tobias Ulbrich points out in a recent article he discusses the current status of the legal proceedings handled in his office. Fortunately, the number of cases dismissed here is in the minority. There is already hope for success in individual processes: In particular, against insurance companies that have refused to cover harm caused by vaccines, they stand a good chance of success. Ulbricht says: “So we continue to look at our work optimistically.” In a comment, he declared that despite the lost cases, he was confident that the situation would change.

Today’s topic: “Interim report by Rogert and Ulbricht on all proceedings in vaccine damage cases before civil courts”

The law firm Rogert & Ulbricht, which is once again leading the way in consumer protection, is handling several hundred legal proceedings in vaccine harm cases, including the first oral hearing.

Since ORR only reports on this when it relates to people who have been vaccinated, here is the current status of the legal proceedings handled in our office:

1. LG Colon Medical Treatment Chamber
   6 x Evidence Verdicts in Lawsuits Brought by Vaccine Victims Against BioNTech
2. LG Mönchengladbach
   A ruling on the lawsuit against BioNTech for September 7, 2023 offers prospects for success. The alliance will have to be covered.
3. lg elvangen treatment treatment room
   Announcement of Evidence Decision
4. LG Munich I Civil Chamber
   Announcement of Evidence Decision
5. lg clave treatment treatment room
   Information and evidence announcement of decision
6. LG Passau Civil Chamber
   “Vaccines cause no verifiable harm in older people” Prognosis: Lawsuit dismissed
7. LG Oldenburg Civil Chamber and single judges who do not wish to be transferred to the Chamber.
   Also considers fraudulent claims as possible. Decision unclear.
8. LG Detmold Healing Treatment Room
   predictive information and evidence judgment
9. LG Düsseldorf Civil Chamber
   3x Dismissal of BioNTech lawsuit and 1x Moderna default judgment. Reason: The authorities are always right. The court will not question any official decision. Once the content is approved, everything should be good. According to this logic, there is no pharmaceutical liability law. All cases are appealed to the Higher Regional Court
10. LG Stuttgart Medical Treatment Chamber
    Forecast: Partial judgment against BioNTech and dismissal of the lawsuit unless further action can be taken.
11. LG Cologne Civil Chamber
    The Cologne Regional Court certifies that an intended case against BioNTech has a reasonable chance of success and will censure DEVK for covering up the case.

While ORR only reports when it goes against the injured side, it would also be fair to show the current balance sheet, which looks much more balanced than the media portrayal. So we continue to look at our work with optimism.

Lawyer Tobias Ulbricht through x

Successful vaccine damage trials will undoubtedly mean the breaking of the dam when it comes to tackling corona injustice. This is why many judges shy away from giving decisions in the interest of victims. This would confirm the lies about the effectiveness and safety of vaccination that politicians have imposed on citizens through exclusion and discrimination. The case of the family judge in Weimar, who exempted children from the mask requirement, showed what can happen with resistant judges. But how many judges can be cleared in this manner if more and more of them return to law and order?