Are you a critic of the government? Then the establishment and its useful idiots consider you possibly mentally ill. In Lower Saxony it will now be much easier for you to be admitted to psychiatric clinics. The red-green state government is aiming to change the law, according to which it will now be possible to issue medical certificates for admission not only to psychiatrists, but also to any licensed doctor – regardless of whether they are actually licensed. I don’t have any knowledge about psychiatry.
A comment from Vanessa Rainer
NDR’s reporting on the draft law in question, which was passed on Monday and is now to be tabled in the state Parliament, is a bit contradictory: It is said that doctors should now be able to more easily accommodate mentally ill people who “pose a danger to themselves or others” in psychiatric clinics., The reason for this is said to be the shortage of psychiatrists. In fact it is they who have to issue the relevant certificate – after all, official placement in a psychiatric hospital is a serious violation of a person’s fundamental rights.
Red Social Minister Andreas Philippi turns this into the opposite: the rights of those affected must actually be protected, he claims. There have already been cases in which people were admitted directly to psychiatric clinics due to the lack of specialist medical assessment. That is illegal. Of course this is true – but to what extent would it help if completely inexperienced doctors could now be involved in psychiatry? Do you think that a urologist will save you from wrong admission? Rather, the purpose is simply to make it easier to approve such a measure on paper so that you get into less legal trouble.
The consequences of mass migration – and the pathologizing of unpleasant citizens?
Why does the red-green coalition in Lower Saxony now feel the need for such a change in the law? Is the number of people at risk of committing suicide or going crazy suddenly increasing rapidly? The negative consequences of corona measures on people’s psyche are beyond question, but how often are people with depression classified as a “danger” to themselves or to others who find forced entry justified?
Critical observers are more likely to see this as the result of mass migration: It is particularly Islamist knife-wielding attackers who are routinely sent to psychiatric institutions as “mentally ill individual criminals” (rather than normal prisons, where society could presumably be protected from them. ). Treating every criminal migrant as a poor, suffering victim naturally puts pressure on psychiatrists and psychiatric hospitals – and all those who are actually dependent on psychiatric and psychiatric help. By far the best in Germany It is becoming increasingly difficult to get (unless you pay privately).
However, in the context of the last few years, it should also be noted that, from the establishment’s point of view, the number of mentally ill people in Germany has literally exploded. While the consequences of their own Corona policy have been largely denied, they instead target all those who have dared and still dare to criticize the government’s course. Did you not follow Corona measures? Have you not been vaccinated? Then, from the establishment’s perspective, you are sick and dangerous – which gives authorities the right to rule over you and your body.
Forced entry and forced vaccination of Holocaust survivors
Let’s recall the case of musician Inna Zhvanetskaya, who had to be forcibly recruited and forcibly vaccinated on the basis of a report (judging by the video recording this is very doubtful). – We reported:
Her alleged dementia with frontotemporal features, personality changes and delusional disorder (as well as her alleged “narcissistic (sic) grandiose self-image”) were not confirmed by her relatives and did not appear in the video recording – but which What was shocking was that the authors of the report were not even able to write their questionable diagnoses in correct German. No clear reason given for entry or for forced corona vaccination – in case of doubt, with the use of force. The evaluator himself also did not recommend. So what did the responsible court do?
Merkel: critic in terms of psychology
The fate of Inna Zhvanetskaya greatly influenced our readers, her case spread around the world. Fortunately, a lawyer fought to have the judgments suspended. But was that an isolated case? In general, anyone who refused corona vaccination was immediately considered a psychopath by the establishment. The pathologizing of unpleasant thoughts became socially acceptable during the so-called pandemic. Unvaccinated people were declared a real threat – and ultimately placed on the same level as Islamic terrorists.
In early 2020, then-Chancellor Angela Merkel declared that so-called conspiracy stories – i.e. the truth – would be “an attack on our society”.
“Normal logic doesn’t help. And this may also be a task for psychologists Or for… Well, we still have to do a lot of research: how do you actually say goodbye to the world of facts and enter a world that speaks a different language, so to speak, and which Can’t we reach our fact-based language?”
Angela Merkel, December 2020
According to the GDR Socialist, it has been concluded on the basis of studies that the threat of Covid-19 to the healthy general population is largely exaggerated and that political measures are not proportionate due to their harmfulness, so it should be referred to a psychologist. Should be taken. Questioning the safety of new types of vaccination technologies, which are being brought to market under the pretext of ultimate health emergency, even though they invariably fail to meet the hurdles for approval, is indicative of a psychological disorder. Because these are statements that politicians of the time called “conspiracy stories.” Anything that contradicted the political line was a conspiracy theory.
The politicians were the real conspirators
Those who deny reality and deny facts did not gather in demonstrations for freedom and fundamental rights, but gathered in the government. Where the latter lied about the third-party safety of experimental vaccines, which were not even supported by the otherwise sacred RKI. Nevertheless, they wanted to impose legally mandatory vaccination. In a real democracy, everyone who voted for him at that time would have lost any right to exist on the political stage. They wanted to force citizens to undergo treatment that was clearly fraught with significant risks and which did not serve the intended purpose at all.
From the perspective of the victims (or their survivors), every health problem and every death in the context of vaccination is the responsibility of those who forced them to take the Covid shot through political measures like 2G or threat of job loss. Of course, those responsible do not want to face this guilt and instead want to silence the critics. When in doubt, you label these people mentally ill and thus dismiss their entire argument as delusional.
pathology that is still unbelievable today
Nothing has changed in this pathology till date. Anyone who has a grudge against people with political responsibility because they have lost their professional existence and got into financial trouble as a result of the Corona measures, Suffers from “pathological bitterness”, according to the mainstream view, from “anger disorder”. – a “serious illness” for which those affected have themselves to blame because they “hold on to what they have experienced” and now “commit self-destructive actions”. Pathologically bitter people may even become suicidal. Self-destructive behavior, suicidal tendencies – can’t any doctor quickly prepare an appropriate report for compulsory admission? Carl Lauterbach is also a licensed doctor – Just imagine how long he would be busy preparing reports for the briefing of all his critics.
This establishment has really earned the distrust of the people. In a country that allows migrant rapists to roam free and portray them as victims, while senior citizens are jailed for critical Facebook posts and opposition members are intimidated with home searches, if If someone expresses his opinion too clearly he fears immediate negative consequences. This suits the rulers. On the other hand, democracy will be rapidly weakened and destroyed sooner or later. Do we want this?
(TagstoTranslate)Germany(T)criminal migrants(T)Lower Saxony(T)government critics(T)forced entry