In Australia, WHO was particularly obedient: strict measures were implemented before COVID-19 spread significantly in the country and mass vaccinations proceeded with experimental corona preparedness. This makes the country a suitable control group when analyzing the harmfulness of corona policy compared to the disease itself. The study of death data shows that there was an increase in excess deaths soon after vaccinations began – and this was before the increase in coronavirus cases. Cases. It is no surprise that in Australia too there are demands to exit WHO.
The Heart Group, a group of British doctors and scientists from a variety of disciplines, examined Australia’s death statistics in a recent article. The Australian government sealed off the country at the beginning of the so-called pandemic and sent the population into radical lockdown. Vaccination coverage expanded with experimental COVID vaccines in 2021. A significant increase in positive tests and deaths due to COVID-19 did not occur until 2022.
According to Claire Craig, a pathologist who serves as co-chair of the Heart Group for Dr., this makes the country an interesting control group: so they analyzed Australia’s death data and examined additional deaths in 2021 and 2022.
Increase in excess deaths in first year of vaccination
First, she notes that death rates from respiratory diseases have fallen sharply during the so-called pandemic years. It remains to be seen whether influenza magically disappeared or whether corona madness led to a reexamination of cases. However, the fact is that deaths from cancer, circulatory diseases and other causes of death other than COVID-19 had already increased in 2021. In 2022, about 9,700 deaths were attributed to Covid (unfortunately, here too, no distinction was made between those who died “from Covid” and “with Covid”), but circulatory diseases and other non-Covid causes The total number of additional deaths (approximately 10,400 deaths) exceeded this number.
It is now possible that the stringent corona measures caused the first consequential damage here, as lack of exercise and psychological pressure alone inevitably had a negative impact on health. However, the fact that excess mortality began just after vaccination began is surprisingly consistent with data from many other countries.
A detailed comparison of deaths from ischemic heart disease, other cardiovascular diseases and stroke shows clear deviations from expected trends: the increase in 2021 was already evident. These illnesses are related to side effects of experimental vaccines. Given that the threat of COVID-19 to the otherwise healthy general population has been greatly exaggerated and that large studies have refuted claims that COVID is responsible for the increase in myocarditis and pericarditis, These figures are food for thought.
Mainstream attempts to blame COVID-19 for any excess mortality are transparent: the evidence for this bold thesis is always lacking. Also, people ignore the fact that Corona “cases” and deaths were recorded based on completely unreliable and misused tests and the numbers are likely much higher. According to WHO, every person who tested positive in the 30 days before death died of “Covid”: however, the tests do not provide any information about whether the person was sick, nor could they help determine the cause of death. There may be some relevance. , We remember: even murder victims were reinterpreted in this way as Covid deaths.
Call to exit WHO
In Australia, the consequences of WHO compliance may have been particularly evident given these data. It is therefore no surprise that there are critical voices in Australian politics who want to prevent a repeat of such a disaster.
For example, South Australia’s Liberal senator Alex Antic expressed sharp criticism of Australia’s compliance with the WHO in March – both in terms of the measures and experimental vaccinations. Antic made a direct reference to the death of a 24-year-old man, which was attributed to vaccination and made headlines at the time. However, WHO continued to say that the vaccine is safe for everyone aged six months and above and that vaccination coverage needs to be further increased. Antic condemned the rampant censorship of unpleasant facts and the stigmatization of critics as conspiracy theorists and questioned why the signing of a pandemic treaty undermines Australia’s sovereignty, following the clear, dangerous failure of the WHO and its guidelines. How can it be taken seriously now? Agreed.
The idea that WHO should have control over individuals’ personal medical decisions is a gross abuse of power. This WHO pandemic treaty represents another descent into a world of centralized power that our leaders, our representatives in this place, cannot stop, and you will all understand this in due time, I assure you. Our government agencies are out of step with the global agenda of WEF, UN and WHO and we are slowly putting our national sovereignty at risk.
senator alex antic
Antic’s clear conclusion: “Exit WHO” – Exit WHO. He is not alone in this demand: resistance to deadly health dictatorships is growing around the world.
