There’s something going on in Great Britain: AstraZeneca will have to answer in court over its harmful coronavirus vaccine – and the British government is also under question. Suddenly there are loud voices in the mainstream about people who have been vaccinated and who do not suffer from any health problems after vaccination, but who express sharp criticism of politicians’ lies and pressure to get vaccinated: British Telegraph has now published a comment that highlights how public criticism of vaccination is long overdue and how misleading the government is.
AstraZeneca is being sued in the British High Court by father-of-two Jamie Scott, who suffered serious permanent brain injury from a blood clot after vaccination in April 2021, in a trial case that even the mainstream is calling a milestone. Sees it as. He almost died from it and has been unable to work ever since. The second lawsuit comes from the widower and two young children of Alpa Taylor, 35, who died after the AstraZeneca shot. These cases could subsequently lead to 80 claims for damages worth an estimated £80 million (just under €91.5 million), all related to so-called “vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT)”. The disease is the name used for cases of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis following corona vaccination, which became evident around the world soon after vaccination began.
The plaintiffs criticize both the misleading nature of the vaccine’s effectiveness and the vector vaccine’s lack of safety. The vaccine was considered “safe and effective” with little to no side-effects that Britain was very proud of, but the absolute reduction in risk was only 1.2 percent. The focus is not only on the pharmaceutical giant, but also on the British government, which constantly explained to the population that they can be vaccinated without any worries and then they will be protected from Covid-19.
The plaintiffs’ defense attorneys emphasize that the case is not about “conspiracy theories,” but about the fact that vaccination cannot simply be declared safe when it has been proven that its As a result people have suffered harm and lost their lives. Several other lawsuits are already pending as other victims also seek justice and compensation.
British mainstream publishes sharp criticism of vaccination
Until now, both AstraZeneca and the politicians responsible have been pushing the story of safe and effective vaccination, but these claims are no longer accepted by the population. In fact, on the occasion of this process, a meaningful comment appeared in the British Telegraph: “The real Covid jab scam is finally emerging” – The real corona vaccination scam is finally (!) emerging. Alison Pearson, who herself was vaccinated, began her article with the quote “I’m not anti-vaxxer, but…” and discussed the case of BBC presenter Lisa Shaw, who lost her life after the AstraZeneca vaccination Was. Report24 had earlier reported on her widower’s legal fight for justice:
Shaw also died from vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Pearson does not shy away from criticism in her article: Everyone was told that vaccination would prevent infection and transmission, and this was the only legitimate reason for mandatory vaccination of medical staff in care facilities. And the vaccine was also said to be safe. Pearson writes:
Ah, yes, “safe and effective.” How many times have we heard cabinet ministers chanting this reassuring mantra? But the use of the word “safe” by a pharmaceutical company
Promotion of a product was banned for years for this very reason – it’s deceptively reassuring. (The government thinks that because she wasn’t promoting a specific product the rules didn’t stop her from calling it “safe and effective”: Mandy Rice Davis like I’ve never heard of.)
One might ask where was the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency)? Ben Kingsley, lawyer and co-author of a brilliant and devastating new book accountability deficit (The Accountability Deficit) says: “With good reason, MHRA rules do not allow AstraZeneca to advertise its vaccine as ‘safe’. “But while many other countries withdrew the AZ jab on safety grounds, the UK regulator remained surprisingly inactive – with tragic consequences for Lisa and her family, while ministers and the NHS continued to insist that the vaccine was clearly Was safe and effective.”“The real Covid jab scam is finally coming to light”, A. pearson
In fact, Denmark had stopped AZ vaccinations two weeks before Lisa Shaw was to be vaccinated. Pearson then condemned the ignorance in the risk-benefit assessment of vaccination for people without Covid exposure, saying:
With a heavy heart I will say what should have been said long ago. Unlike those who were actually susceptible to Covid, Lisa Shaw did not need a Covid vaccination; For them the small gain was worth the small risk. I didn’t need any (I had the virus in January 2020, as abundant antibodies later proved, and enjoyed good immunity). Millions of healthy people lined up for a vaccine they didn’t need, which protected the elderly and vulnerable from serious disease but was not necessary for most others.
How this country moved from a policy of vaccinating only those at risk of doing “some crazy harm” to people like Lisa Shaw may yet prove to be one of the great scandals of our time.“The real Covid jab scam is finally coming to light”, A. pearson
The fact that vaccination had a significant effect on high-risk patients should be considered unproven. But for a long time such clear words seemed impossible in the mainstream.
Criticism of vaccination is right, important and overdue
Finally, Pearson goes a step further and warns:
I’m not anti-vaxxer, but… let’s stop saying that, shall we? There is no shame in opposing giving the vaccine to groups that don’t need it, resulting in the deaths of people who should be living and taking their eight-year-old son to school.
“The real Covid jab scam is finally coming to light”, A. pearson
Even in the British mainstream, it is increasingly being accepted that criticism of vaccination is legitimate and correct and that the popular accusation that someone is “anti-vaxxer” is simply irrelevant. It is not just the mainstream in general that should pay attention – The population must also get rid of this absurd fear of what might be said to them if they raise unpleasant facts. This can of course apply not only to pharmaceutical crimes in the Corona crisis, but also to issues such as illegal mass migration or politically supported warmongering.
