Over the past three years, our freedoms have been largely restricted. Attempts have been made to dictate where we can go, when and whom we can meet, how we should breathe and what experimental substances we should be given. However, what is currently planned by WHO far exceeds what has been experienced so far. Negotiations on changes to the WHO Epidemic Treaty and International Health Regulations are currently underway. What has been revealed so far shocks every freedom-loving person. Recommendations should become an obligation for states and our elected representatives remain silent – be it due to ignorance, ignorance or calculation.
It is known, at least among the alternative media and their interested readers, that changes to the WHO Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations are currently being negotiated. The main ingredients are:
- One person – declaration of a global health emergency by the Director-General of WHO
- WHO has broad powers in the event of such a global health emergency
- No appeal or review of this global health emergency
- Censorship against everything WHO doesn’t like
For more information and ideas on how you can do something about it yourself, we recommend the website: www.mehr-wissen.info
The program is as follows: Negotiations on changes to the pandemic treaty and international health regulations are ongoing through 2022. These are to be agreed upon at the 77th World Health Conference in May 2024. The pandemic treaty requires a two-thirds majority at the World Health Assembly; A simple majority is enough to change international health rules. After that, Member States can only implement the pandemic treaty into national law within the next 18 months, that is, until November 2025. The changed health rules will automatically come into force in the Member States after 12 months, i.e. until June 2025.
A brief from the German Bundestag shows plans to ratify the pandemic treaty and thus establish “parliamentary legitimacy of the treaty.” In addition, the International Health Regulations are also expected to be approved, although this will not be necessary due to the legal nature of the regulations. This means that international health regulations can come into force in Germany not only after the one-year period has expired, but also immediately after ratification.
EU is negotiating
What is particularly interesting about the current negotiations on pandemic treaties and international health regulations is that private stakeholders are actively involved in the negotiations, but not our elected representatives and our governments. On March 3, 2022, the European Council decided that the EU would not lead negotiations by individual member states. Negotiation guidelines can be found in the appendix.
It is written there in black and white that this will not happen in the future recommendations is about WHO, but it is about commitments: “Pandemic Treaty, intended to supplement the International Health Regulations (2005) (hereinafter “IHR”) for its contracting parties Substantial, legally binding obligations have been establishedWhose main objective is:
– Prevention and control,
– detection and reporting and
– Prepare for and respond to public health threats with the potential for a pandemic.
The Austrian Chancellor clearly doesn’t know anything
That’s why our elected representatives are not taking part in the conversation and are pretending to be ignorant. For example, Dr. Konrad Breit, management consultant and president of the Brightside Association, received information from the Austrian Federal Chancellor on May 24, 2023, in response to his request that the legal nature of the WHO convention to be negotiated is not yet known and that WHO Issuing “general recommendations”:
“Like any international document, the current domestic procedure will be in accordance with the Austrian Federal Constitution. Only when the legal nature of a WHO convention, a treaty or other international arrangement to be drafted and negotiated by the INB has been established, should a decision be taken on the domestic procedure in accordance with the Federal Constitution. As the leading international organization for global health issues, WHO generally issues recommendations that are not legally binding on its member countries.
At the Austrian Federal Chancellery, people are behaving as if the new pandemic treaty and significant changes to existing health regulations were still completely unknown. While the conversation is going on diligently over our heads and hair-raising things can already be seen in the draft so far, the intention here is to give the impression that it is “still too early” to tackle these questions. Is. Note: This “too early” suddenly becomes “too late” in May 2024. As soon as the legal documents are ready for voting, our elected representatives can only implement what WHO tells them to do.
The information that WHO will issue “general recommendations” also applies to the current situation, but will not apply as soon as the new treaty comes into force. Over 80% of WHO’s finances come from determined contributions, which enable various sponsors to benefit from WHO’s pandemic-related decisions. Do you need to know more to understand that money rules the world?
German Green Party announces: All WHO decisions will be approved
In Germany, people express themselves a little more directly, because here they at least accept that decisions are not made by national parliaments. National parliaments apparently serve only as a pseudo-democratic cover. Johannes Wagner (Alliance 90/The Greens) said at the German Bundestag meeting on May 12, 2023: “All decisions taken at WHO – whether it’s pandemic treaties or changes to international health regulations – are approved here in Parliament.”
Many things have already been “approved” in Parliament by those responsible, regardless of the content. If this is the case this time too, then they themselves are blessing their lack of freedom. Do they want that?
