Such a punishment which is not fair at all. That is the result of the Techtmeister test, says Dr. Susanne Fürst, deputy club chairman and constitutional spokesperson of the FPÖ. Report24 spoke to him in an interview about the inconsistencies of the trial, the verdict and its significance for child protection.
An interview by Edith Brotzner
Dr. In the Report24 interview, Suzanne Furst got candid words about the outcome of the Techtmeister trial. She sees unfair punishment, which has no general deterrent effect, as an invitation to potential criminals. They do not allow conditional prison sentences to deter their crimes. The FPO’s constitutional spokeswoman blames not only the producers of child pornography, But also among the consumers of these images, which promote the abuse of children.
The fact that children’s rights are being trampled on has happened not only in the Techtmeister case (and countless other cases with similar outcomes and less prominent perpetrators), Rather, it has also been shown how we behave with our youngest children during the Corona period.
To date, no government party has felt obliged to comply with the FPO’s request. Increase the minimum sentence for child abuse and both To officially ban child sex dolls and pedophile handbooks. From Dr. For one, someone like Techtmeister, who promotes child abuse to this extent, actually belongs in prison and deserves a lifetime entry on a criminal record.
Sensitivity and awareness are also completely missing among the left-green cultural elite. Instead of worrying about the victims of abuse, people just pity their “poor” co-actors, celebrate them by giving them awards and think only about the success of the film.
The most important questions remain open
For the constitutional spokesperson, many unanswered questions remain unanswered. Why were no witnesses or Techtmeister’s companions interviewed? Although there is evidence that he exchanged ideas with others, why is this question not being investigated? Is it really possible for a person to consume child pornography at such an intensity for such a long period of time and go undetected? Have any efforts been made to uncover all the connections? Why was Techtmeister not prosecuted for cocaine possession?
mitigating cause, Furst views the fact that Techtmeister was a clean, first-time offender with no previous convictions – given the intensity and duration of the crimes – as wrong and a failure of justice.
It is also questionable – if you think about the rapid and widespread censorship of videos criticizing Corona – why stronger action is not taken against criminal videos and images regarding child abuse. Instead of continuing to focus on government critics, it would Now is the time to increase the capacity of investigators to deal with child pornography. Corporations should also be held responsible for removing such content. From Fürst’s point of view – and this speaks to the hearts of many Austrians – What is needed is to increase the punishment rates instead of making such serious crimes smaller and smaller.
