The publication by Danish scientists on the different rates of side effects in different vaccine batches has caused controversy. In this context, a group of German chemists repeatedly condemned the lack of quality control by responsible testing laboratories with very high tolerance values in the concentration of active ingredients and excipients in gene therapy drugs, which made it possible. Introducing to the public batches with very different compositions. But how did the differences between vaccine batches arise in the first place? GGI Initiative investigated.
Report24 has already reported in detail about side effect rates and abnormalities in vaccine batches several times:
So far we can only guess how the differences occurred. The GGI Initiative (formerly “Greens against Compulsory Vaccination and 2G”) raised questions about the possible background in their most recent press release:
BioNTech Vaccine: Placebo, Poor Effectiveness or Unsafe Production Process?
Press Release of GGI Initiative on August 31, 2023
Although there are hardly any vaccinations against corona now, the relevant vaccines and their side effects are still the subject of many studies and publications. We read again and again that some batches of vaccines may not contain any active ingredient, so they are just so-called placebos. This interpretation does not appear to be conclusive; Rather, the varying effectiveness may be the result of defects in the production process. Further studies should definitely be sought to gain greater clarity,
Batches with different effectiveness
The debate originates from the publication of Schmeling et al. Back from March 2023. In this, three groups of batches were identified, one of which showed a particularly high number of side effects (blue), while the other showed almost none (yellow). (1)
The fact that these are deliberately manufactured placebos was clearly refuted in the article by Jessica Rose (American virologist and medical data analyst focusing on the VAERS database). Essentially, the problem seems to be that the yellow batches are the most recently produced and circulated; There was accordingly very little time for any entries to be made in the reporting system. Since some batches were also distributed in the United States, reports on these can be found in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System = US Reporting System for Vaccination Side Effects). And it turned out that there is no significant difference between different batches. (2)
Vibeke Manniche, the second author of the above paper, also addresses this fact in an interview with John Campbell. According to him, the batch dates were not available when the paper was accepted for publication. However, shortly afterwards, the responsible Danish authority abandoned it. And it has indeed been confirmed that they are the young batch. Manniche also says that the first batch went to the elderly on one hand and health workers on the other. (3)
Many problematic aspects related to quality control are still relevant at this point. It appears to have actually been scrapped by the EU Commission and some officials in 2020 in order to speed up approval processes. We have already discussed this in the previous broadcast. (4) This is probably the origin of vaccine contamination by plasmids. Molecular biologist Kevin McKernan was the first to discover it. (5)
contamination, manipulation or coincidence
From the above description it follows that Three possible explanations, All of these are based on a hasty redesign of the BioNTech vaccine production process (biochemical -> biotechnological) to scale up mass production.
- The first batches were particularly contaminated with residues from the production process, and purification probably didn’t really work. That’s why there were a lot of reports in the beginning, over time the production has become systematized and the process has become cleaner.
- process not cleaned Persistent and serious side effects may be caused by the mRNA technology itself or a combination of the technology and production process. The first vaccinations have generally been completed, with reports of side effects and harm being recorded as before. This actually resulted in a very clear safety signal. However, they did not want to further jeopardize the vaccination campaign (especially after the turmoil over Johnson & Johnson in the United States and AstraZeneca in Europe). Gaslighting and censorship have been used to largely suppress reporting of side effects and harms. Accordingly, batches may not have been secured, but under-recording may have increased.
- Given the confusion surrounding production, cleaning, storage, and transportation, it is theoretically conceivable that the contents of individual bottles (or even entire batches) could become so small and/or decompose and/or spoil. was emulsified. That some doses did not develop bioefficacy. However, other doses may have been much higher. This is, of course, speculation, but it should be kept in mind as an option. Ryan Cole presented a similar approach at the Better Way conference (September 2022, Vossendorf). However, conscious production of placebo seems very unlikely.
Uncertainties and questions
Many publications and studies already exist on the production and effectiveness of Covid vaccines, as well as their side effects, and new ones are constantly being added. There have been repeated reports of alarming rates of side effects from some batches of vaccines, most recently from Denmark (6). at least it could be No restrictions on thinking and research Give, data Sure accessible Can be made and compared. open investigation must be desirable and sufficient financed and published wEarth.
Source:
(1) Schmeling M & al. Batch-dependent safety of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Eur J Clin Invest, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13998
(2) Rose J. Yellow Dot Lot Disproving the Placebo Theory, Substack, 2023. Online: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/debunking-the-yellow-dot-lot-placebo
(3) Campbell J. Viral Vaccine Paper, Dr. Vibeke Manniche, YouTube, 2023. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgldG9r-i9M
(4) Green Association for Fundamental Rights and Freedom of Information. GMO exemptions and good practice in the EU – prelude to the vaccination crisis, 2023. Online: https://ggi-initiative.at/wp/pm-44-eu-lockerung-von-gvo-und-guter-praxis-auftakt-zum-impfdesaster
(5) McKernan K. Nepetalactone Newsletter, Substack, 2023. Online: https://nandamide.substack.com
(6) Vaccination scandal on the assembly line: https://www.achgut.com/artikel/impfskandal_am_fliessband
