Anyone who leaves to work in Germany receives not only cash benefits, but also health insurance, rent, part of energy costs and various other items of daily life financed. Of course, money does not fall from the sky, but is generated by the working population, who are increasingly forced into existential difficulties. While real wages in Germany are constantly falling and the price explosion caused by politics is actually eating away at the middle class, citizens’ benefit recipients and asylum seekers are now able to expect a huge “wage increase” next year. Needed
A comment from Vanessa Reiner
Red Labor Minister Hubertus Heil does not want to promote work, but instead wants to drastically increase citizens’ money – the top attraction factor for economic migrants and social swing for all those who prefer to live at the expense of others – years to come. There are also no exemptions due to legal requirements, it is emphasized: Citizens’ benefits will increase by 12 percent… and cash benefits for asylum seekers will also increase.
Citing the Federal Employment Agency, “Bild” writes that there are 3.9 million employable people who prefer to live on citizens’ money, and an additional two million are children.
The news comes on the heels of heated debate about basic child welfare – another non-performing income at the taxpayer’s expense which, as is so often the case, disproportionately benefits immigrants to the country. Anyone who believes that the recipients will use this money exclusively for the benefit of children also believes in Santa Claus. Finance minister and top fail Christian Lindner (FDP) even had the courage to claim on social networks that basic child welfare would give “concrete incentives for parents to work”. How well it has been accepted is evident from the comments under this post, such as the following:
Even if the population had a real right to co-determination, there would probably be no possibility of an increase in the citizen allowance, as a survey on the Bild website makes clear:
While the “old” left still has the well-being of workers at heart, the new-left and those on the street have labeled any criticism of the bloated German welfare state as “coming down”: this is somewhat similar to the Pfizer vaccination. It’s like talking about the issue. Complaints about side effects – The truth is seen reluctantly, but its benefits are feared.
Why does the government punish those who finance their failed policies?
The truth is that what German politics is doing is constantly quitting. That is, in the name of those who work hard every day not only to earn their living and support their families, but also to run the country. The latter, although it is currently being deliberately pushed to the wall by its leaders. The work of every post driver, every cashier, every garbageman and every sweeper (all jobs that deserve more respect than they get) is incomparably more valuable to Germany and its citizens than the lobbyists and the arrogance of Underestimated by the German rulers full of. their ivory towers. If low-paid sector workers prefer to switch to citizens’ benefits sooner or later, will the Bundestag clean its own toilets?
The criticism of unlimited mass migration in the German social system also has nothing to do with racism: People with migrant backgrounds, who work diligently in this country, are generally not as enthusiastic about looting the welfare state as they are about helping finance it like any other taxpayer. So are they racist? Similarly, the Germans are not very happy with compatriots who can work but prefer not to do so (for those who really cannot work, there is a disability pension, keep in mind).
This is not “kicking” – The main reason behind this is the knowledge that it is a welfare state, open to idlers and looters, which is one of the reasons for the huge tax burden in Germany, which has always been huge. This tax burden naturally keeps a lot of real skilled workers from abroad (and also takes German skilled workers abroad). In such a system those who do not intend to contribute are the first to arrive. Where will it end?
Scholz finds working people very “impressive”
Incidentally, the last pension increase was significantly less generous than the announced increase in citizens’ benefits: Anyone who wastes their life in Germany is clearly less valuable to politicians than those who keep their feet up. likes to keep up. When, at a civic dialogue in Erfurt, an elderly woman emotionally told the permanently smiling Chancellor Scholz that she and her husband – both pensioners – would have to continue working because otherwise there would not be enough money, he simply Said: “Very good, you are very hard-working. You have endured this your whole life, and I think that is something that I have always found very impressive. What a power of language! What Scholz and his traffic light guys do every day is far less impressive. German politics serves almost everyone, but certainly not the “German people”. is that fair?
AFD: “Destructive False Incentives”
The only serious opposition party in Germany, the AfD, has drawn up a counter-proposal to citizens’ money, which, among other things, relies on the benefits of commodities rather than cash and aims to actually dissuade those involved. who are able to work. Work. Labor and social policy spokesman for the AfD parliamentary group, René Springer, explained in a press release about the civil benefit increase:
“What Michaela Engelmeier of the German Social Association describes as a ‘good signal’ is actually a reinforcement of already existing pernicious false incentives. The gap between falling real wages and inflation-adjusted standard rates has become increasingly narrow, making work more and more unattractive for many Germans. At the same time, the migration magnet of the German welfare state, which is open to the whole world, is being strengthened again – and this includes a quota of about 50 percent for foreigners to receive citizenship benefits.
Inflation is a big problem and decline in real wages is also a big problem. However, current tools cannot be used to respond adequately without triggering further social crises. Without fundamental reforms, the civil allowance system and the increase in civil allowances will lead to destructive false incentives. That is why the AfD parliamentary group has already introduced the concept of activating basic protection through an application (document 20/3943). We are demanding, among other things, benefits in kind instead of cash benefits for migrants in the social system and an obligation to work for employable recipients of social benefits if they have been receiving benefits for more than 6 months. are doing. This is the only way to prevent the over-expansion of the welfare state and thus its eventual collapse. The work must be worth it and transfer payments should not be made unrestricted without giving something in return – especially not to migrants who have never contributed.
Is this approach antisocial? Or is it no more social than the direction of a traffic light, which always seems to be contrary to what benefits the sovereign? In any case, German citizens should think carefully about where they will place their cross in the future: not only their own future is at stake, but also the future of Germany.
