Unbelievable: The family judge who overturned mask mandates in two Weimar schools during the Corona period will face a prison sentence. According to the public prosecutor, he was not responsible for the removal of the mask requirement. The prosecutor sought three years in prison for perverting the law, the defense requested acquittal. The man wanted to protect children from harmful measures – now he is accused of this.
Last Friday, the case against the family judge who removed the mask requirement in two Weimar schools in April 2021 ended before the Erfurt district court, which contradicted the hygiene concept of the Thuringian Ministry of Education in force at the time. In doing so, he agreed with a mother who filed a lawsuit against requiring her two children to wear masks. His decision was overturned in later instances. The public prosecutor’s office alleges that he wanted to set an example against the state’s corona rules with his decision. “He wanted to set a signal against the state measures that existed at that time,” argued the prosecutor. By doing so they “crushed the rule of law”.
Prosecutors are convinced that the trial proved that the defendant searched various networks for the children whose names he was responsible for. He eventually found two children whose parents enabled him to initiate child custody proceedings. However, these were only a means to act against the Corona safety measures. The prosecutor said, “The children were mere puppets of the process.” It would also go to show that the experts on the basis of which he had taken his decision were never appointed to examine the two children. The judge had already knowingly violated the law in force by issuing his decision to all students of the two schools in Weimar. According to the district court’s business distribution plan, he was not responsible for all of the children in the two schools. beyond comprehension: The public prosecutor’s office demanded a three-year prison sentence for perverting the law.
He fought for the welfare of children
Defense attorneys sought acquittal on the grounds that the family judge was only concerned with the welfare of the children. One of the lawyers pointed out that it was legitimate and understandable that, given the widespread corona restrictions, the family judge had considered in advance of the proceedings whether this would endanger the well-being of the children. In any case, the state’s corona safety measures, especially for children, were completely exaggerated.
The respondent assured that he only thinks about the children while taking his decision and will get back to them at any time. The 60-year-old man has already been suspended and is facing a threat to his existence. A decision is expected this week.
Regarding the decision of scam against the doctor, Dr. Heinrich Habig, who issued vaccination certificates at the request of patients without vaccinating them and therefore had to serve 2 years and 10 months in prison, may not be ruled out even by the family judge. In such cases, an example is often made, loosely based on a quote from Mao Zedong: Punish one, educate a hundred. Government critics live dangerously in the best Germany of all time. Those who courageously stood up against the unjust Corona regime to protect their fellow citizens are still being persecuted.
