Is there a measurable “global temperature”? No. All of the dramatic “records” that are announced with grim expressions by the mainstream on a daily basis are based on modeling by climate activists who want nothing more than to create panic. Your data is only one thing: specialized scientific waste.
A guest post by Oliver Gores, first published on Freiheitsfunken.info
What is the temperature in Hintertufingen? Let’s see. The temperature in the Huberbauer barn is 15 degrees in the morning, 24 degrees in the afternoon and 21 degrees in the evening, but that was yesterday.
The afternoon temperature at the market square is 32 degrees. It’s always twelve degrees in Auntie Fine’s basement. The church tower is 80 meters high, the temperature there was just 22 degrees, 23 degrees two meters above the church square, 34 degrees on the ground because the sun was shining on it. But it’s cool under the village linden, only no one has measured it there.
Franz does not have a thermometer, Benno has a broken one, Ferdi has a 19th century thermometer, and Bruno has a digital thermometer with two decimal places.
It’s hottest on photovoltaic modules in the solar power park of the Hintersolartupfcomplex. You can fry scrambled eggs on it, but no one measures it.
You can’t measure over the village pond, in the garden under the apple tree with Gerda the temperature is 20 degrees and at the garden wall 24 degrees, and there is no thermometer in the forest or in the fields. The temperature in Gunter’s car measured 27 degrees on the main road, but it is now raining and the temperature has dropped to 21 degrees.
So how high is the temperature in Hintertufingen? How hot is it on average today, tomorrow, in winter? And how hot is it in Germany? in Europe? And what is “global average temperature”?
Absolutely
Anyone who believes that there is such a thing as “global temperature” or “world climate” and that it can even be measured should explain how it works.
But of course you can choose weather stations, invent missing stations over ocean, satellite data, mountain weather stations, buoy readings, weather stations at paved airports, in ports and heavily built up inner cities in, densely populated in the United States and widely scattered in Siberia, non-existent in Antarctica, add, correct, adjust, divide, average, homogenize, normalize, standardize, run through algorithms , adding a hundred correction factors, shaking three times, mixing, shaking – And the computer reports the “global average temperature” accurate to two decimal places.
Lo and behold, it’s 1.09 degrees higher than the global average temperature of 1853 – which we’ve somehow determined very precisely.
And you believe it all because it’s got a serious face Daily News has been announced and because otherwise you are a climate denier and a Nazi. Correct?
scientific waste
No, of course you don’t think so. But the commercial compulsive media addict believes so. And he believes that you can add up the temperature data from weather stations using very low-level math and divide it by the number of stations. How else?
Only brilliant elementary school students realize that this will not measure the global mean or average temperature in any way, but only the average of the temperature of the weather stations – a very meaningless quantity.
The slogan issued by the climate panic industry that the third or fourth of July or any other day of July is the hottest day ever in human history is not based on measurement. Only this no one tells you in the news or on Justemilyu’s other promotional channels.
So I would have to say: These scathing reports of incessant panic orchestration are not based on scientists’ measurements, but on computer models from climate activists interested in the panic.
In this case, they agitate, for example, from the University of Maine in the United States. They don’t use any measurements, but just estimates from data from eleven satellites, which measure not temperature at every location on the 510 million square kilometers of Earth’s surface, but a value from the density of microwave radiation from oxygen atoms. Let’s take it out. in the atmosphere, which mathematically corrects for many factors, such as the decreasing flight altitude of satellites, and then estimates the altitude distribution of temperature in the atmosphere and thus a hypothetical surface temperature on the ground with a resolution of more than 100 reaches on. kilometers. The Climate Reanalyzer of the Climate Change Institute at the University of Maine models and visualizes a hypothetical value called the global mean temperature by combining it with a computer model.
But since the failed measurement of the average temperature at Hintertufingen, you and I know there is no such thing. You cannot measure temperature in regions, but only at defined points, of which there are an infinite number of in any non-homogeneous region. Which is why this weird concept of “global average temperature” has existed ever since the climate panic industry led by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) came into existence.
And if you compare such models with the predicted temperatures hundreds or thousands of years ago, down to the decimal places, then logically nothing special scientific waste, highly contaminated and toxic, turns out.
In simple language: nobody knows the global temperature. That size doesn’t matter. No one can measure them. That’s why no one knows the global environment. This concept also does not make any sense and is used only for promotional purposes.
A cool head in Gerda’s garden
It becomes very embarrassing when meteorologists and climatologists get really serious and all available actual temperature measurements from meteorological stations, buoys on the ocean and temperature measurements at a height of two meters above the ground from airports around the world are taken by the weather authorities. Let’s take Twelve afternoons around the world are streamed into a database throughout the year, from thousands of weather stations per hour, and real average values are created from them. Without any modeling mumbo-jumbo – in other words, tangible comparative values with which even short-term changes in measured temperature can be seriously evaluated. What comes out then?
Voila: the average value of temperature measured by weather stations is currently, in mid-2023, 14.14 degrees. Compared to the 30-year average of temperature measurements (normal), the 2022 reading was 0.26 degrees below normal. In 2021, it was 0.11 degrees below normal. The 2020 one was normal but correct. In 2019 it was 0.36 degree less than normal. The temperature of 2018 was 0.74 degrees below normal. The temperature of 2017 was 0.26 degrees below normal.
If you don’t believe, you can see it with your own eyes on the internet at temprature.global.
This means: measured with no frills, relative increases in temperature, nothing in record years, and nothing in global warming. On the contrary: the past five years have been somewhat cooler than the past three decades: a slight cooling has been measured.
As in the crisis of Corona measures: Without imaginary modeling and manipulation under the guise of “science”, lasting panic cannot be generated.
So don’t be a fool! Lie down on a deck chair under an apple tree like Gerda in Hintertufingen, let the global media stream buzz about the global average temperature and keep a cool head.
oliver gorseBorn in 1970, lives and works in Lake Constance and has been a small multi-entrepreneur for over 20 years. He is editor of the online magazine “Der Sandwirt”, writer, columnist for “Freiheitsfunken” and comments on “Eigenteigliche Freie”, “Kontrafunk” and on Twitter. This article first appeared on freiheitsfunken.info.
