The theater that “woke” cultural workers are now putting on to combat their own circle of influence seems completely absurd. Examples like these also show how degenerate this breed of people is. The controversial Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyj was not allowed to speak at the Oscar ceremony because the war in Ukraine was not diverse enough. Only whites would fight whites there. A justification can no longer be more inhuman.
A comment by Willi Huber
Please don’t get me wrong, dear readers. I don’t miss what feels like the ten thousandth Zelenskyj speech with the usual demands and the intensely itchy nose. The good news is that at least Oscar night was spared this man and his ideology of the senseless blood sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of young men. Anyone who wants the war to be prolonged instead of peace and is willing to sacrifice the lives of others to do so is not my friend.
The fact that Zelenskyj was not allowed to speak at Oscar night is a breathtaking scandal in left-wing, globalist circles, which is now also known as “woke”. Many system media are already rowing back to calm things down. So the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” deleted its question “For reasons of diversity?” again from the title of their relevant reporting – which was photographed and discussed in many places.
The “woken” organizers of the Oscar ceremony refused the Ukrainian warlord speaking time because only whites would fight against each other in Ukraine. Apparently it is important to those responsible that black people also die a senseless death in a brutal war. However, Selenskyj recently indicated that he expects the United States to send American sons and daughters to the war to die there. (Zelenskyj puts pressure on Washington: USA must “send sons and daughters to war”). There would certainly be some with darker skin among them.
The Süddeutsche article is – how could it be otherwise – once again hidden behind the paywall. In order to be allowed to read the “war” of the self-righteous among their own kind, 9.99 euros are due. I wouldn’t want to pay that. But the introduction suggests where the journey is going:
The Ukrainian President should not be allowed to speak at the Oscars ceremony. The reason is obviously that earlier conflicts have not received the appropriate attention – and one does not want to change that for a conflict between white Europeans of all things.
When it came to the source of the message, the system media consistently referred to a report by “Variety” – of course you are again above a proper link. Where would we be if ordinary people could check the truth of a newspaper report. I can tell you – you would come to Report24, where we of course researched and found the original source: Read it here (if you are interested): Oscars Reject Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s Bid to Appear on Telecast (EXCLUSIVE). There you can read the following:
But not everyone is onboard with giving Zelenskyy more airtime. Last year, Oscars producer Will Packer nixed a Zelenskyy appearance. Sources say Packer expressed concerns that Hollywood was only showering Ukraine with attention because those affected by the conflict are white. By contrast, Hollywood has ignored wars around the globe that impact people of color, he argued. Packer did not respond to a request for comment. It is unclear what the rationale is for this year’s Oscars rejection, however, the Academy traditionally prefers to focus on the contributions of the filmmaking community and steer clear of anything political.
Translated this means:
But not everyone agrees with giving Zelenskyi more airtime. Last year, Oscar producer Will Packer refused a Zelenskyy appearance. According to sources, Packer expressed concerns that Hollywood is only showering Ukraine with attention because those affected by the conflict are white. In contrast, Hollywood has ignored wars around the world affecting people of color, he argued. Packer did not respond to a request for comment. It’s unclear what the reasons behind the rejection of this year’s Academy Awards are, but the academy traditionally prefers to focus on the contributions of the filmmaking community and stay away from anything political.
The laugh of the century is that Hollywood, which is deeply left-leaning and dedicated to the US Democrats, wants to be “apolitical”.