Perhaps the globalist LGBTQ madness has completely different backgrounds. The medium “Standard”, a member of George Soros’ “Project Syndicate”, published jubilantly that Osaka University had succeeded in breeding mice from genetic material from males. These consequently have “two fathers”. One cheers that this could probably also work in humans. Critics turn away in horror and disgust.
A comment by Willi Huber
In an ungodly time devoid of morals and values, such research is obvious. Man thinks that everything is allowed and that it would also make sense to set such unnatural processes in motion. The future will show where this madness leads. Today it shows an article in the Standard.
Scientists from Osaka University generated female cells from pluripotent stem cells of male mice. According to the experimental design, these were the result of natural errors. The cells were divided until defective cells with two X chromosomes emerged – instead of those with X and Y chromosomes for the male sex. The cells “recovered” in this way were then transformed into unfertilized egg cells, which in turn were fertilized with normal male sperm. These absurd chimeras were then implanted into female mice, which had to carry them to term. (At least for that you still need women, but artificial wombs are being researched just as intensively.) Of the baby mice produced in 630 experiments, seven survived.
These seven were said to have matured into “healthy adults” who became fertile themselves. A steep statement, because it can be assumed with a probability bordering on certainty that science is not in a position to find out all the genetic defects in these artificially created beings – certainly not in the psyche of the animals. Likewise, no statement can be made as to what defects the offspring of such creatures will exhibit – or the offspring of offspring. Those looking for morality in such experiments will probably not get over staring holes in the air.
It’s bad enough that the Standard is considering applying these technologies to humans. If you follow the current delusion of gender change and allegedly 72 or more biological genders, you can guess where the journey is going. In the example above, women are removed from society in the long term and, if at all, only serve as mere incubators. Japanese researcher Hayashi, also a member of Soros’ Project Syndicate, told the Guardian that he expects to be able to use the method on humans in ten years. He wants a “broad discussion” about the possibilities.
Scientists have created mice with two biological fathers by generating eggs from male cells, a development that opens up radical new possibilities for reproduction.
The “Guardian” is happy about the new possibilities.
Those who want to read the study themselves have had bad luck with the Soros media. Such links to primary sources are not expected of the readers – or are not intellectually able to search for and find them in the scientific literature. Of course we went on a search for those who were interested and can deliver this source in nature: The mice with two dads: scientists create eggs from male cells.
“Perks of having two fathers”
It was not the first such attempt. Mouse babies with two fathers were “made” by American researchers back in 2010. Even then, the goal of this research was clearly stated: “… and possibly one day helping same-sex couples to have children, according to the study, which was published in the US journal Biology of Reproduction.” At that time you still linked to sources, namely this magazine: Volume 84 Issue 3 | Review of the journal Biology of Reproduction (biolreprod.org). It contains not only the description of the production of mice without female oocytes but also a commentary by Peter de Boer and Marieke de Vries entitled: Are There Benefits from Having Two Genetic Fathers? Translated: Are there advantages to having two genetic fathers?
If the women of this world don’t wake up now to realize what the Globohomo-Agena means for them and how they as women have been used, abused and screwed by all left-wing parties, it is questionable what else has to happen. The solution can only be to focus on conservative, natural values, to give the inhuman parties a democratic rebuff and to ban relevant research.