Beautiful new world. In Davos, the playground of the “elite” around Klaus Schwab, people don’t mince words anymore. At best, the new goals will be announced in a few words. So speaks “eSafety CommissionerJulie Inman Grant from Australia speaks of a necessary “recalibration of human rights” and goes on to say that she means, among other things, freedom of expression. Because everything would be so polarized that it doesn’t have to be.
Those who do not want dualism or pluralism of opinion, like Julie Inman Grant, are asking for a “recalibration”. This is obviously the brave new word for the censorship of all opinions that deviate from the given consensus opinion. Listen for yourself:
Mrs Inman Grant has a problem with the fact that for so many opinions there is also a counter-opinion. It doesn’t have to be. So you have to rethink human rights. That is apparently the tenor that prevails in Davos in 2022, where they want to further advance Klaus Schwab’s agenda of the “Great Reset”. Ultimately, entire countries will probably be “recalibrated” if they do not submit to this agenda.
It should be noted that a number of elected politicians from countries whose population is apparently unhesitatingly betrayed to globalism also meet in Davos. Imagine going to the World Economic Forum as the elected representative of your country and preaching that freedom of expression should be restricted worldwide. Do these people actually have the democratic mandate to do so? Both for the trip itself and the highly problematic, anti-democratic statements? If not, why are they not subsequently prosecuted in their home countries?