With the advancing so-called “pandemic situation” many people are becoming more and more unsettled. The fact that the mainstream cannot be trusted is well documented and understandable by numerous incidents. But is every report presented to you in the resistance automatically correct? Opinions differ on topics such as “graphene”, “graphene oxide”, “microchips in the body”, “5G”, “chemtrails” and much more. We go in search of clues.
The claim: Vaccinated people can be located with a standard mobile phone. They would broadcast a WiFi or Bluetooth identifier, also known as a MAC address. The background should be designed as follows: Graphene or graphene oxide dust would be introduced into the body with the corona syringes. This should be able to organize itself and form “microrouters” in the body. These, in turn, would then attempt to contact the Internet or suitable receiving devices via WLAN/Bluetooth.
An exciting material for a science fiction story. Anyone interested in finding the truth would do well to think carefully about this assertion first. Is that really possible?
Problem one: graphene / graphene oxide
The theory that vaccines contain graphene oxide persists. Worldwide, two people in particular have dealt with it. A Spanish scientist named Prof. Pablo Campra Madrid and the late Austrian Dr. Andeas Noack. That alone is problematic in that graphene oxide would have to be present in every sample examined worldwide. There is now also a civil society project to investigate the ingredients of vaccines. Numerous samples from different manufacturers were examined and many impurities were found (see: Also confirmed in Germany: Toxic metal impurities contained in vaccines).
What was not found in all these investigations was graphene – and no microchips, by the way. Unfortunately, the testing of the vaccines has to be carried out mainly by civil society, since governments and the health institutes actually commissioned with it do not perform this task or do not talk about it. After months of research, we at Report24 were able to determine that not a single Pfizer/Biontech batch had been examined in Austria.
We do not consider the self-proclaimed experts Campra Madrid and Noack to be credible and can also justify this – however, this would go beyond the scope of the article. About the Spanish professor: This is a professor of agricultural sciences, his study was based on a single sample of unknown origin and was not officially carried out within the university framework. As defined above, such exams must unfortunately take place in a “private” setting. However, we consider it helpful if the people carrying out the work are experts and, as in the case of the German test series, one focuses on one variety of samples and analyzes that are also transparent and traceable.
An expert, for example, was much more likely to be Dr. Andreas Noack, who did his doctorate in chemistry. Unfortunately, Noack’s theories are the same a very isolated individual opinion that has not been confirmed by either accepted or alternative scientists. He mainly lectured on the fact that the supposed graphene oxide in the vaccinations should be understood as very small knives that cause damage in the body. However, numerous more comprehensible expert reports and analyzes of the confirmed ingredients of the alleged vaccines have shown that many other harmful effects are conceivable or could also be proven in the pathology. In none of these harmful effects was an influence of “graphene oxide” necessary and also not detectable.
Self-assembling microdusts
Graphene oxide or not, it is claimed that vaccines contain microdusts that can self-assemble into complex objects. Graphene would certainly be useful in this regard, since it possesses electrical conductivity. A trace made of graphene would therefore have at least the same properties as a copper wire, with which one could of course very well form the basis of circuits. A microcomputer that is able to deliver the required functions looks, for example, as shown in our title picture or here below.
Where do the microchips come from, where does the software come from?
Such a microcomputer consists not only of conductor tracks but of much more complex technical components such as transistors, capacitors and microchips with which arithmetic operations can be carried out. In addition, it must have a memory in which the correct programs are stored. Because when it comes to wireless connections to WLAN or Bluetooth, we are talking about mature communication protocols, the computers have to communicate with each other and send out clearly defined command chains. All of this must also be stored as software. It should be logically obvious to even the most die-hard proponent of the theory that no computer programs can manifest from dust – even if all the other components miraculously fitted together.
Where does the power supply come from?
The power supply is even more problematic. Because the required radio technology is an active technology, i.e. the transmitter must be supplied with enough power so that it can not only carry out the arithmetic operations but also emit certain signals on a certain frequency with sufficient transmission power. This requires either a battery or a generator. Although there are conceptual microgenerators, which can be driven from the bloodstream, for example, that such are composed of dust and supply a finished microcomputer with electricity is completely unthinkable given the state of human technology. Just as a battery (or a capacitor or a transistor) could not be made of graphene alone, it would also require a number of other materials.
What works and what doesn’t work
Conclusion: Mankind has no technology capable of combining the claimed properties:
- self-assembling micro current generators from (graphene) dust
- self-assembling transistors from (graphene) dust
- self-assembling memory chips from (graphene) dust
- self-assembling microchips capable of arithmetic operations from (graphene) dust
- self-generating software from (graph) dust
The only technically achievable criterion is, within a very limited framework, that substances can be imprinted with the property of self-organization, that they repair minor damage in materials or come together to form very simple structures. This does not mean that these substances, which have already been researched, have electrical conductivities, because they are not graphs (see link). However, this is only the first of numerous steps that would be necessary to make the claimed technology possible.
Alternative thinking: Finished microchips are injected
One should never exclude possibilities in one’s thinking. It is conceivable that miniaturization technology has progressed so far that entire circuits with all the necessary transistors and chips can be made so small that they fit into a grain of rice, for example, maybe even smaller. That still doesn’t solve the question of the necessary power supply. Here, however, one must still ask the question of how and where the production capacities for such a technology should come from in order to mass-produce it in the billions (!) on the market.
And mass production is not enough, the conspiracy theory says that each of these microcomputers has an individual Mac address. This means that it has to be embossed during production. Anyone who has studied where production plants for “vaccines” were being pounded out of the ground at breakneck speed all over the world will doubt this version.
Even if all this were solved, there is still a practical problem. When vaccinating, five doses were drawn up into syringes from an ampoule. How do the invisible, small microcomputers know that they have to be divided among five syringes? One person would have to be injected with five of them and others with none. Which could not be in the spirit of the sinister inventors.
Alternative: “stupid” NFC or RFID chips are injected
Of all the options discussed so far, this is technically the easiest to implement: Near-field communication only requires a passive construct without much “intelligence”. Basically, you can start with simple structures that transmit specific information when stimulated by external energy (radio waves). The limitations mentioned above also apply here; an individual embossing with a special number is rather unthinkable when it comes to the production of billions. A cheap, ready-made and comparable technique is IDChips for animals – albeit much larger. With the technology already available to mankind, it would be conceivable that self-assembled or ready-to-use structures emit a message when a corresponding reading device comes close: “Yes, I am vaccinated”. A reference project for this is the following (although it works completely differently technically!): Dec. 2019: Bill Gates funded project for micro-tattooing vaccinated children. The link is only intended to show that the principle is being worked on.
Stay alert. Check everything. Don’t blindly believe anyone, including us. Don’t let anything or anyone fool you, not even after two years of “pandemic” and all accompanying government measures and media disinformation campaigns. Keep your sanity, we will need it badly in the times that are yet to come.
