With a positive test, he wanted to get a recovery certificate. Both confessed to “the nonsense”, but were not punished for it.
The younger man had also been charged with intentionally endangering people with communicable diseases. However, it turned out that there should not have been a personal delivery of the saliva sample, which is why he was acquitted on this point. Rather, the patient who fell ill at the end of January had deposited a tube outside on the window sill next to the entrance to the house at an agreed time, both defendants assured.
The suspect (18) picked it up in the early evening of January 28th, mixed the saliva with his own and gave the PCR gargle test. The positive result was not long in coming. But then he was invited back to a test, he reported. However, he never found out the result, but received a call to report to the police.
Immediately “I admitted everything”. He was the only one in his circle of friends who hadn’t had a corona virus yet and had “come under pressure” because of the 2G rule. However, he did not want to be vaccinated. Then he heard that his friend (16) was ill. A phone call followed and an agreement had been reached, they testified before the judge.
Looking back, he knows that this was “not a smart idea,” said the older man. But: “I wanted a little more freedom.” Even if the falsification of evidence is not “a trivial offence”, the judge refrained from punishing it. She was “good hope” that she saw the blameless boys “for the first and last time” in court. So there was only one guilty verdict for her.
