Poison and bile is being spit on social media about a “war crime”. An alleged Russian tank intentionally ran over a civilian vehicle. In fact, it was a Ukrainian tank. Whether it was controlled by Russian or Ukrainian soldiers cannot be determined. The entire video, which Western media rarely or never shows, also proves war crimes committed by Ukrainians, who keep firing at a seriously injured, disabled man for fun.
A comment by Willi Huber
Everything that has been presented since February 24th has absolutely nothing to do with journalism. It is shocking how few people understand this. Even those who understood the fraudulent deception of the Corona pandemic years are now falling into the same traps again and thinking that the same system media are honestly reporting on the Ukraine crisis. No, of course they don’t. It is lied that the beams bend – and no opportunity is missed to transport the desired narrative of the bad Russians. Only: things are not that simple. War is not to be celebrated, not even by one side, but always rejected because there are only losers.
First, this perspective of the incident emerged, which doesn’t say much.
Clips showing an alleged Russian war crime are presented in most western media. See the Daily Mail, which insinuates intent: He SURVIVED: Shocking moment elderly Ukrainian driver was pulled ALIVE from crashed car after ‘barbaric’ Russian troops DELIBERATELY swerved around a tank to run over his car. Just: At that time there were no Russian tanks in that place, the Russian offensive was still very far away. The vehicles were undoubtedly Ukrainian vehicles. This is also proven by the fact that they do not have the conspicuous, large markings that have been sighted on Russian vehicles since the beginning of the war.
The incident was indeed embedded in a firefight, which also explains the anti-aircraft armored vehicle’s strange handling. It was under fire, tried to avoid it and went out of control – and accidentally crashed into the vehicle. Anyone who knows anything about military tracked vehicles knows that no one drives over obstacles intentionally, especially in times of war. If the chain is damaged in the process, it can mean the death sentence for the crew. Driving through entire houses without a scratch, that only happens in Hollywood films and would only make tactical sense in very rare cases.
Other perspectives of the incident show that a second military vehicle was involved in the action. Since this one also did not have Russian markings, the following interpretation could be correct: Russian commandos stole the vehicles and were on the run when they came under fire from Ukrainian defenders. A soldier falls to the ground. Then the attackers come and keep firing at the man – obviously for their sadistic pleasure and out of sheer hatred, because it doesn’t make any sense. If there was a war crime in this situation, it was probably a Ukrainian one. But the system media, which have been brought into line with the system, do not report that, of course.
To colleagues in the system media, some of you may be uneducated and have to write about things you don’t understand. But that’s no excuse for a lack of empathy and utter heartlessness. There is no excuse for cheering for war and killing.
