The “Greens against compulsory vaccination and 2G“ have addressed the GECKO Commission with a catalog of questions and are demanding important information on monitoring the safety of the Covid vaccines and on data management for the PCR tests.
The authors of the letter – among them MMag. dr Madeleine Petrovic – discuss their motivation as follows:
We are asking you these questions because of the high degree of uncertainty in the Austrian population with regard to the safety and effectiveness of the so-called COVID-19 vaccination, the high physical and psychological stress on people (especially children and young people), and also because of the disproportionality of the COVID-19 measures and the resulting collateral damage. However, we also ask these questions for many people out of deep personal concern.
Testing of vaccine batches by AGES
Since Austria as Test site for vaccine batches in the EU acts, but the population does not receive any information worth mentioning in this regard, it is checked very carefully here how exactly one fulfills one’s control mandate. Among other things, the question is: Are batches controlled independently of pharmaceutical companies? Have quality differences been found in vaccine batches and, if so, are there correlations to the number and severity of suspected cases of vaccine side effects? Do the storage conditions of the vaccine affect the quality – could there be a connection between side effects and degradation products due to improper storage?
Questionable safety of certain vaccine components
From the outset, there was little or no information on the production and biology of the lipids used in the vaccines – the manufacturers owed this for a long time and even now the public has no idea to what extent the safety of the substances has been researched. In the letter, the “Greens against compulsory vaccination and 2G” ask, among other things, for data on the breakdown metabolism of these lipids: Are they excreted after the vaccination – or do they remain in the body?
The fact that there is no indication in the current declaration of consent for vaccinees that the vaccines are in phase 3 of a clinical study is critically questioned. At Pfizer, for example, the final study report is not planned for July 2024. One also investigates to what extent the reports on deficiencies in the approval study that were published in the BMJ were reacted to.
How seriously does Austria take vaccination side effects?
The authors also go into great detail about the side effects of the Covid vaccine:
How do you justify and justify compulsory vaccination medically and scientifically specifically for
healthy people, where the side effect reports are constantly increasing, as is well known, only preliminary
Approvals exist, clinical trials were partially carried out inadequately and not
are completed, and also no long-term experience with the COVID-19 vaccines
present?
Doctors refuse to report suspected side effects of the vaccines – although they are actually obliged to do so. The “Greens against compulsory vaccination” therefore ask the GECKO Commission why no standardized or even active reporting process is being introduced. They also propose setting up a hotline for vaccination side effects. They are also asking for information on the extent to which reports of side effects are checked promptly and by trained physicians and whether studies have been commissioned to investigate damage caused by the vaccination. Are you actively asking vaccine manufacturers to improve safety?
Other issues include the lack of public information about effective treatments for Covid-19, cases of long Covid after vaccination, potential environmental damage from Covid vaccines, and the ethics and funding of vaccine advertising.
Data security in PCR tests
Another relevant aspect is data protection in the context of Covid tests. Many citizens fear that the samples for the PCR tests could not only be analyzed for the immediate test purpose – that Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz, for example, would use the PCR test during their visits to Russia. On-site testing for fear of DNA theft refused, strengthened the last. In the letter, the “Greens against compulsory vaccination” ask, among other things, whether and when the citizens’ samples will be destroyed after the Corona-PCR and whether the destruction will be documented. How do you ensure the data security of the citizens here?
Finally, information is requested on any donations for members of corona committees from the pharmaceutical industry.
All questions should be answered by March 12, 2022. In principle, the GECKO would even have the chance to build trust here – as long as it is credibly demonstrated that the focus is on the safety of the population and that the critical aspects of the corona vaccinations are taken seriously and monitored. If the authors of the letter and the public fail to provide the information requested, this shows once again that the so-called “pandemic” is definitely not being acted for in the public interest.
You can read the full letter with all the questions here:
