In Vöcklabruck, Upper Austria, a 62-year-old doctor threatened the 68-year-old community doctor with shooting. Because the doctor honestly informed his patients about the meaning of corona vaccinations for breastfeeding and pregnant women in accordance with his medical professional understanding and in accordance with the package inserts of the vaccine manufacturers, his colleague wanted to visit him with the Kalashnikov. The police are investigating, the doctor has confessed. System media demand consequences – for those who are threatened.
If you follow the previous logic of the President of the Medical Association Szekeres, the threatened person can probably say goodbye to his license to practice medicine. Because medical advice that deviates even slightly from an absolute and total vaccination recommendation is not welcomed in Austria.
Should I go and see him? With a Kalashnikov.
The anesthetist addressed these words to the mayor of the town when she learned that the municipal doctor advised pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers against experimental Covid-19 gene therapy, also called vaccination by the mainstream. They were not intimidated and the police were called in. This invited the elderly anger doctor – she confessed. She would have been “at odds with her professional colleague”.
While the medical association, under the command of the socialist apparatchik Thomas Szekeres, is proceeding with great brutality against all dissidents among the medical profession, even if they only issue masked exemption certificates, no opinions have been expressed or even announced disciplinary measures on the described facts. The fact that action should be taken against the threatened doctor instead can be seen from the vile reporting by APA and the system media:
Consequences for threatened physicians unclear
The Upper Austrian Chamber of Physicians has not yet been able to answer whether the municipal doctor can expect legal consequences. The National Vaccination Panel advises pregnant women who are not yet or not fully vaccinated to be injected in the second or third trimester.
These media reports make it clear how degenerate the journalistic landscape in Austria has become. Basically, the conformist mob howls for the head of a doctor who has been threatened with assassination, instead of asking how, in an enlightened, democratic society, academics could end up threatening each other.
Contrary to the factually incorrect reporting of the system media, whose only interest is to drive as many people as possible into the needle in a manner dependent on the government from the current leaflet from Comirnaty clearly shows that vaccination for pregnant and breastfeeding women is very questionable and dangerous.
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
There is limited experience from the use of Comirnaty in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not allow for direct or indirect adverse effects in terms
Infer pregnancy, embryonic/fetal development, parturition, or postnatal development
(see Section 5.3). The administration of Comirnaty in pregnancy should only be considered
taken if the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk to the mother and foetus.
It is not known if Comirnaty is excreted in human milk.
According to this current manufacturer information, a blind vaccination recommendation for pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers is not only wrong but also criminal, but in any case a press agency or a non-specialist editor of a system medium is certainly not entitled to do so.