Things are not going particularly well for Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum: Only recently the planned “Open Forum” in Davos, which was to take place in January as part of the World Economic Forum, had to be canceled. The reason: massive death threats. Now the entire meeting has been called off.
A comment by Vanessa Renner
The Omicron variant can serve as a reason. In a opinion can be read:
Despite the meeting’s stringent health protocols, Omicron’s portability and its impact on travel and mobility have warranted a postponement.
Instead, they will hold some online meetings in which “solutions to the world’s most pressing problems” will be developed. You’d think that’s all there is to it. However, Klaus Schwab personally considered it to be absolutely necessary to send a real threat to the people – so he is quoted in conclusion:
The postponement of the annual meeting will not prevent progress through the continuous digital calling of executives from business, government and civil society.
(The deferral of the Annual Meeting will not prevent progress through continued digital convening of leaders from business, government and civil society.)
These words are suspiciously reminiscent of Marvels “Inevitable” Thanos. Either way, Schwab put it nicely: At the time of the supposedly worst pandemic in human history, the word “prevent“Namely, preferably used to describe the prevention of illness and death. From the point of view of the common citizen, Klaus Schwab’s ideas of “progress” fit very well into the category of those catastrophes that should rather be prevented. Schwab is fully aware that his wet dreams of the Great Reset do not meet with approval from the population, not least because of the constant death threats.
WEF for compulsory vaccination, child vaccinations and against freedom of religion
After all, the World Economic Forum is doing a lot to stir up people’s anger. There was support there in December alone Vaccination requirements in the workplace, gave tips on how to become parents and Makes children willing for vaccination and shot against it on the side religious exemptions, which numerous people around the world refer to in order to avoid compulsory vaccination. The style of these articles is always the same: In a pseudo-fatherly manner, the stupid little citizen is supposed to be told that Papa Schwab and his lackeys only want the best for the world and the rank and file living in it.
This is what one claims on the basis of one commissioned by the WEF itself survey, that the absolute majority of the working population around the world are in favor of compulsory vaccination in the workplace, yes, really demanding. It’s about “protection”! Around 14,400 people in 33 countries were surveyed. It was better not to publish who this funny questionnaire was sent to and what areas the respondents came from. Either way, the data is not meaningful.
In the article on the Child vaccinations a Canadian “expert” claims frankly, the Covid vaccines would have virtually no side effects in young children. Long-term consequences such as an impact on fertility are excluded. In the meantime, the American CDC had to admit that the first cases of cardiac muscle inflammation occurred in children from the age of 5 within a very short time – and in fact nobody can predict the long-term consequences of the vaccine. The children should meanwhile be distracted with soap bubbles during the vaccination – clapping and singing after the spade are also suitable.
The article with the title “What role should religion play in COVID-19 vaccines?“Is ultimately an open attack on the otherwise so zealously preached religious freedom: Religious views would only be used as an excuse, one is certain – And of course, legitimate concerns about vaccines and their development, for example because of the use of cells from aborted fetuses, are not ignored. You don’t even bother to amuse yourself about a pastor who, because of this fact, refrained from vaccinating and then died of (or with) Covid-19.
Anyone who regards manipulation, coercion and oppression as “progress” may well cry a few tears after the WEF in Davos 2022. However, many people will not be. Fortunately, Schwab and Co. will find it difficult to fully implement their regressive fantasies.