We have already mentioned many times that it is an international state of knowledge that you do not vaccinate during pandemics. The reason is that viruses tend to mutate – after a vaccination campaign, only those are inevitably left that are not or poorly reached by the natural and vaccination-induced defenses. It’s logical, it’s natural evolution. The Standard claims the exact opposite in its December 2nd online cover story. Is it ignorance, dishonesty, or premeditation?
A comment by Willi Huber
They call it fact check, I call it a falsehood – and I can back it up. The standard was titled: “Fact check: Why mutations do not arise because of vaccinations”. Anriss: “Mutations are reading errors in the viral genome. But the more people in a population are vaccinated, the less likely this process is. ” These statements are both hair-raisingly wrong. The fact that they are detailed in the article text is quite nice, but many people only consume cover images and headings and form their opinion from them. This is then just as hair-raising wrong.
Basics of virology say otherwise
The achievements of modern virology are based on 250 years of medical experience, The first successful attempts at immunization are said to have taken place 1,000 years ago in China and India. At this point I would like to note that I am familiar with the theory that viruses do not exist, but do not consider it plausible. Too much has been researched and discovered in this area by millions of researchers. Other vaccinations actually work too well against dangerous diseases.
In short, if you do not want to believe the following counter-statement but want to investigate yourself, the following should be recommended for your research: Search on Google or in a search engine of your choice for “Virus Mutation Vaccination” and set the search period so that it ends on 1/1/2020. On Google, for example, you will find an excellent one in the first place Explanation in Quantamagazine: “Vaccines Are Pushing Pathogens to Evolve”:
Vaccines promote the mutation of pathogens
Just as antibiotics create resistance in bacteria, vaccines can induce changes that allow diseases to escape their control. Researchers are working to stave off the development of new threats.
10.5.2018, Quanta Magazine
The technically excellent article is based on numerous scientific sources. We ourselves are never satisfied with one source alone, which is why we recommend other sources and invite you to continue searching yourself (see the search suggestion above, which you can of course change as you wish):
Numerous scientific papers explain the well-researched basic principles
History of Vaccines – Viruses and Evolution explains that it is natural and logical for pathogens to outsmart immune systems and vaccinations: The pathogen’s job is to evade the immune system, create more copies of itself, and spread to other hosts.
A scientific work published in PLOS in 2015 suggests that “imperfect” vaccines can actually accelerate the spread of viruses. Spoiler: The previously never successfully tried mRNA vaccine can hardly be considered “perfect”, that it is not shows the explosion “Vaccination breakthroughs”: Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens.
Conventional wisdom holds that natural selection removes highly lethal pathogens when the death of the host greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep the host alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population.
PLOS, 27.7.2017
A very relevant article for the corona pandemic, as well as a scientific work, is “Is seasonal vaccination a contributing factor to the selection of influenza epidemic variants?”, published in Taylor Francis Online, July 2017. In my opinion, the following excerpt from the abstract describes exactly what is currently to be noticed in the coronavirus pandemic.
It is unclear whether the immune pressure (vaccination pressure) caused by the vaccination can have a certain influence on drift-related mutations. Recently, our results suggested the possible effect of vaccine pressure on HA mutations by directly comparing the amino acid differences of the respective vaccine strains between isolates from vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. It is possible that influenza vaccination pressures select variants that are genetically distant from the vaccine strains.
Taylor Francis Online, 18.10.2017
Why do the standard editors do this?
The above article is certainly not intended to bring the truth to light. Rather, it is based on the narrative of politics, which, especially in Austria, is hardly based on virologists but more on ideologues, statisticians, complexity researchers, Red Cross managers and other non-specialist people. Actually, every medium should add to every publication how much money it receives from press funding and how much it receives from state and state-related advertisements. Then it may be easier for the reader to determine whether it is free information or attempted indoctrination. The fact that one propagates the opposite of the state of the art in science so roughly is a rarity even in the domestic news landscape that is considered to be “bought”. In particular, that one only shows one page by adding “fact check” as the quasi-religious only truth and just negates 250 years of the history of virology.
In addition to technical and logical deficiencies in the standard, there is also the question of how one can be so arrogant as to dismiss millions of years of the development of human life and propagate the 3-hour invention of the Ugur Sahin as a panacea to prevent a pandemic which is roughly a strong flu wave corresponds to combat. A wave of illnesses from which mankind – viewed from a distant perspective – was at no time seriously threatened. No matter how much one is afraid of “Covid-19” after two years of media coverage – an undeniable fact from statistics from all over the world is that over 90 percent of the very old people die from Covid-19, as well as those with poor immunity and previous illnesses. People under the age of 60 who are in normal health were at no point in any noteworthy risk.
Possible explanations for the one-off failure are conceivable: The editors, in this case Pia Kruckenhauser, don’t know any better. Of course, the lady has no technical expertise and is, for example, too “Public Health Graz” already noticed with their “anecdotes”. Apparently she has more “experience” with such demanding ones Topics like “My Kardashian Moment”, published in Woman, 2017. Perhaps this type of reporting is also ordered directly, paid for with taxpayers’ money and distributed with intent. We don’t know and no editorial team in the world will answer such a question, so we save ourselves the inquiry. In dozens of cases we researched, the gentlemen from the standard did not ask others, which they often even denounced with criminally relevant allegations. Reason enough to exclude them from the principle of trust.
The standard – one of the leading online media in Austria
The standard used to be considered a medium that researched better than others, employing the most excellent editors who take the time to analyze a situation. At the latest with the Vranitzky Doctrine, which opened deep rifts within the population, by dehumanizing FPÖ voters and subsequently patriots and declaring them enemies, became the standard for an ideological pamphlet. Re-education and constant trumpeting against the political enemy became daily business. When it became unbearable, I canceled the pink paper.
In the online area, Standard achieved one of the top spots in the media landscape within a very short time. A website with excellent technical and content design attracted an audience of millions, even if the print standard never really achieved a particular reach compared to other daily newspapers. The online standard always found the greatest variety in categories that often do not even appear elsewhere, such as science or reviews and literary criticism.
Part of the success story is the online forum, which invited tens of thousands of readers to exchange ideas. Especially after the legal restrictions for the ORF’s online efforts, the number of users exploded. That was funny for the users until the standard introduced censorship with extreme ideological impact. Unpleasant messages were suppressed there even when Facebook was still a free place for exchanging views. On Similarweb, the standard has 21.64 million visits per month to date and is the 14th largest medium in Austria. A large part of the access is still due to the forum users, who cannot be separated from the readers of the editorial content. It is all the worse that journalistic standards there are now so depraved, as described above.
Körberlgeld with pairing initiation
PS: Standard is likely to generate a considerable part of its sales with its in-house pairing initiation portal, known elsewhere as the “single platform”. There it is mainly advertised that young women prefer older wealthy men. Anyone who consumes the online standard cannot avoid the relevant, very intrusive advertising for it. Of course, all of this is strictly serious, has to do with the “newspaper for readers”, with critical thinking and of course with a high degree of respect for women, as it is preached day in and day out by left-leaning journalists. Double standards? Completely impossible with the standard.
