While the experimental vaccines allow the vaccinees to continue to transmit Covid-19, this does not appear to be the case for those who have already been infected with the virus, according to the US CDC. This resulted from a request from a lawyer. Politicians have to react to this.
Politicians want to ensure that as many people as possible are vaccinated with the experimental Covid vaccines. And that although this was made for a variant that no longer circulates. But that’s not all. Rather, it seems as if all the side effects clearly outweigh the benefits (at least in the general population). Because While SARS-CoV-2 is particularly fatal for the elderly and the sick, more and more young and healthy people are dying as a result of the experimental vaccines.
Even people who have already been infected with the coronavirus and have thus acquired a natural immunity should, according to the will of the rulers, be “poked”. But that is utter nonsense. Because a natural infection not only ensures that the antibodies remain in the body for a long time. According to the US CDC, there is also no known case where a person who has recovered from a new infection would have transmitted the virus to other people. This is interesting in that the politicians want to vaccinate those who have recovered too. And not only that, they are locked away and harassed as well. Obviously there is no basis for it.
No transfer known
The federal health agency was asked for documents this fall by an attorney, Aaron Siri, on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network, which “Reflect any documented case of an individual who (1) has never received a Covid-19 vaccine; (2) once infected with Covid-19, recovered and later re-infected; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when they became infected again. “ In a November 5 response released this week, the CDC stated that it has no documents related to the request.
“One would assume that if the CDC suppresses the civil and individual rights of persons with natural immunity by expelling them from school, it will fire them from their jobs, disconnect them from the military, and worse, that the CDC had evidence of at least one case of an unvaccinated, naturally immune person spreading the Covid-19 virus to another person. If you believe that, you are wrong“Said Aaron Siri in his blog post. The official reason is not to collect such cases. But how can we then justify the fact that vaccinated people who have been shown to act as vectors have more rights than naturally immune people?
No profit for big pharma
A lockdown for “unvaccinated convalescents” is therefore not only completely unconstitutional, but also completely absurd. Partly because it is already there more than 100 studies to natural immunity there. By and large, these confirm that this is either as strong as the so-called vaccination, or even clearly superior. In this respect, antibody tests would also have to be completely sufficient as proof of infection. But Big Pharma doesn’t earn anything from that.
Above all, it shows that the classic “infection strategy”, which was recommended by many epidemiologists more than a year ago, would have made more sense. A path that Sweden followed, for example. The focus should have been placed on protecting the vulnerable social classes. For the broad mass of the population, however, all these restrictions are completely absurd. Because lockdowns don’t work anyway. This has been shown time and again in the past. Politicians in power don’t give a damn about it, however.