After some sharp criticism of the statements made by the President of the World Medical Association, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, about an alleged tyranny of the unvaccinated, he is now blatant again. in the WELT interview he used perfidious statistical and linguistic tricks to defend himself and his statements, but then he finally got into a rage and equated the unvaccinated with citizens of the Reich.
An angry comment from Max Bergmann
The interview begins almost harmlessly. And unusually critical for mainstream journalism. The presenter of the TV channel WELT begins her argument by referring to the vaccination breakthroughs that are becoming more and more popular. According to all findings, completely vaccinated people are as highly contagious as those who have not been vaccinated, as numerous studies have shown. Vaccinated people also landed more and more frequently in intensive care units and had to undergo intensive medical treatment, at least 25 percent, as the moderator explained. The number of unreported cases is likely to be significantly higher. “That is a misconception that everything is great and over when we are all vaccinated”, she confronted the chairman of the World Medical Association.
Narrative of the “easy course” – definition of vaccination ad absurdum
Montgomery first stated that there is never 100 percent safety in medicine anyway. He almost gives the impression that nobody has promised 100 percent effectiveness, not even the government. Incidentally, the Paul Ehrlich Institute defined the controversial vaccine as of August 15, 2021 as “COVID-19 vaccines protect against infections with the SARS-CoV2 virus”. Secretly and without much attention, the new definition since October 7th has only been: “COVID-19 vaccines are indicated for active immunization to prevent the COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus”.
The well-known and valued measure critic Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg pointed on twitter in the past repeatedly on the changing definitions and also expressed his own proposal for the definition of the Covid-19 vaccine: “COVID-19 vaccines protect manufacturers from liability and vaccinated people from social exclusion”. Montgomery also mainly refers to that “Much easier courses” that vaccinated people went through in his opinion. But there is no longer much talk of immunity. He only marginally explained that in order to protect those who have previously had illnesses in society, we would all have to be vaccinated with one of the highly controversial Covid-19 vaccines, “so that we can get rid of this virus”.
Montgomery knows statistics – but only when it suits him
It got interesting when he put the number of breakthroughs in vaccination in relation to the number of “completely vaccinated” people in Germany. Indeed, so-called experts are still able to apply statistical principles. Yes, a number alone is rarely worth anything. That is why you put them in relation to another in order to make the number more understandable and clear. Obviously Montgomery can do that, but only if the subsequent argument fits his business. He forgets – or deliberately ignores the fact that the number of people who “died of or with Covid-19” should also be put in relation to the total population, or in relation to the number of people who die every day due to normal mortality. It goes without saying that his “correlating” the vaccination breakthroughs is tough tactics and nothing more than transparent propaganda for the people who think along with them.
Vaccination breakthroughs are belittled with statistical and linguistic tricks
He gives the impression that vaccination breakthroughs are not that special, because in his opinion the number of vaccination breakthroughs is negligible in relation to the number of “completely vaccinated”. But why do you only apply such mathematical and statistical basics when it suits experts? “That is about 2 per thousand”, he states in relation to vaccination breakthroughs in the WELT interview. The mere use of the unit “per mil” should of course make it clear that the number of those vaccinated who tested positive is absolutely not statistically relevant. In the same way, one could also determine that only around 1.2 per thousand of the population in Germany died “of or with Covid-19”, if one looks at the official figures for this. But instead, people like to use horror images like Plane crashes or “as many corona deaths as an entire city” worked.
“Very many citizens of the Reich” – Montgomery apparently sees those who have been vaccinated as the majority of better people
But what so far looked at least like a certain selective intellect, if not necessarily understandable, soon slipped into the irrelevant and extremely impudent. The WELT moderator rightly pointed out the increasing division in society and the fact that unvaccinated people are no longer treated with friendliness. She asked the legitimate question whether it would not make much more sense to confront unvaccinated people with respectful communication and argumentation instead of degrading them and putting them under pressure. The chairman of the Montgomery World Medical Association only had a tired but clearly audible smile for it, from above. He confirmed that calm and factual communication was very important to him, just to immediately drift into the irrelevant:
“If you would see the emails that I get and the communication from the unvaccinated, in which many people such as Reich citizens and people with, I want to put it carefully, extremely crude ideas are involved, then I’ll say it plain and simple, as the vast majority of those who have been vaccinated, as the vast majority who have performed their social task to protect the population and all of us, we can no longer allow ourselves to be bullied by them! ”
To top it off, he went one better and declared the Covid-19 vaccine to be a “proven, effective and well-tolerated” vaccination – without any evidence of this.
“Where are the big side effects, where are the big dangers?”
But as if all of this was not enough, the President of the World Doctors, apparently switched on from the home office, mocked the numerous victims of the sometimes serious side effects of the Covid-19 vaccine. Frank Ulrich Montgomery actually came out in the WELT interview as a genuine and fanatical denier of side effects. Cardiac muscle diseases, especially in young men, and cerebral vein thrombosis are only the tip of the iceberg that Montgomery brazenly swept under the table and denied. He also does not mention the numerous vaccine reactions and side effects, which did not lead to immediate death but to days or weeks of impairment in the vaccinated. Whether long-term consequences could arise is also not foreseeable due to the unclear data situation and the lack of long-term studies. It is also undisputed, at least among supporters of science, that the currently available and only conditionally approved Covid-19 vaccines cause side effects to a significantly greater extent than classic and well-known vaccines and are in the rarest cases particularly “well tolerated”. Not even when clowns like Karl Lauterbach declare the vaccine to be a “vaccine free of side effects” and use their Twitter reach for their dangerous propaganda.
Tyranny of the vaccinated, the mainstream media and the government
The appearance of Frank Ulrich Montgomery in the WELT-TV interview after his already outrageous appearance on Anne Will made one thing clear again: We are definitely not experiencing any tyranny of the unvaccinated who justifiably reject a vaccine. But we do experience a tyranny of the vaccinated, who want to impose their point of view, their opinion and their view of the world with all their might. With coercion, pressure, social ostracism, exclusion, defamation and discrimination, those who have been vaccinated (though not all) work increasingly and specifically against those who have not been vaccinated. We are experiencing a tyranny of the mainstream media, which incite and incite the vaccinated with fear, panic and exaggerated narratives. We are experiencing a tyranny of the governments of this world, which increasingly take pleasure in the repression of the population. This is no longer about one or the other vaccinated person for government statistics. Here it’s only about the principle: Follow the majority, or go under. Frank Ulrich Montgomery made this majority principle clear again in his WELT interview. Yes, the vaccinated are (now) the majority. But that alone does not give the vaccinated the right to bully the unvaccinated. This tyranny against the unvaccinated must stop. Not tomorrow, not the day after tomorrow, but now, immediately, and forever!
