While a commission of inquiry set up by the Swedish government describes the country’s corona policy as “inadequate, inferior and slow“Criticized, is one in the Scandinavian country study appeared, which once again reinforced doubts about the effectiveness of the various vaccines.
by Vanessa Renner and Daniel Matissek
The evaluation of data from more than 840,000 double vaccinated people over nine months confirms several accusations of the vaccination critics that compromise and incriminate the international vaccination cartel. The results show:
- that the infection protection at Biontech / Pfizer is already after four months reduced by around half.
- with the Biontech vaccine after seven months no protection at all is available, with the Vector AZ vaccine even after four months.
- after six months only one more 42% relative protection against severe disease consists.
- the protection against serious illness in risk groups, people with previous illnesses and apparently men in general even faster subsides.
The effectiveness of the vaccines declines rapidly in practically all groups of people; The only differences are in the extent and speed.
The database
Of course, with such studies it must always be remembered that the collection of corona numbers is anything but undisputed: The underlying data come from the Swedish health authorities – the determination of the relative vaccination effectiveness was based on a comparison with an unvaccinated control group that had not previously tested positive for Covid-19 (and was therefore presumably not naturally immune by the authors). During the study period, a total of 27,918 symptomatic infections were “detected” by PCR test among the 1.68 million people whose data were used, the majority (21,771 infections) in unvaccinated persons. However, it cannot be ruled out that people who were vaccinated were simply tested less often than those who were not vaccinated.
Also with regard to hospitalization and death, it is hardly possible to prove whether the counted individuals were in hospital or died because of or with corona – and whether tests were carried out to the same extent in both groups. For example, a double-vaccinated neurological patient with cold symptoms may not have been tested directly for Covid-19 at times when the vaccination was still considered the ultimate protection – an unvaccinated tends to be. In their study, the authors evaluated 277 cases of hospitalization or death among vaccinated individuals and 825 cases among unvaccinated individuals. The relatively low infection and hospitalization / death rates already indicate that the absolute effectiveness of the vaccine is low – and the need for vaccination for the healthy general population is therefore worth discussing.
Are vaccinated more at risk than unvaccinated people after 210 days?
If you take a closer look at the data of the study, you will discover a curious abnormality: The comparison of the counted “events” (i.e. infections) in people who have been vaccinated twice and those who have not been vaccinated shows that after more than seven months (210 days) vaccinated people seem to fall ill more often than unvaccinated people. At least there were 522 sick people to be vaccinated against only 62 sick people who were not vaccinated.
The reason for this abnormality is unclear – a causality cannot be reliably deduced. It should only be pointed out that well-known physicians and scientists warn against the fact that vaccinees could be confronted with more frequent and more serious diseases in the later course. A negative effect of the Covid vaccine on the immune defense is also being discussed.
Booster vaccinations for everyone?
The results of the Swedish study now serve as welcome “evidence” of the claimed need for constant booster vaccinations – although the study does not, of course, prove the effectiveness of booster vaccinations (with the same controversial preparations as before).
A vaccination with only temporary protection for vulnerable groups would be justifiable and proportionate if it were safe and well-tested. However, the medium and long-term side effects have still not been researched, which was not even possible in the short development and application time. Nevertheless, more and more aggressive vaccination campaigns are being run. What is showing in more and more facets is this: Covid-19 has been exaggerated into a danger that never existed in this form. Completely excessive countermeasures, which went hand in hand with unprecedented encroachments on fundamental rights since 1945, were whipped through with all their might. Studies that contradict this course, no matter how well-founded, no longer find their way into the mainstream media at all. What does not appear there is then dismissed as “conspiracy theory”, “corona denial” etc. Politicians and the pharmaceutical companies, media and “experts” associated with them have for better or for worse committed themselves to a wrong path, one without a massive loss of credibility and considerable political and social distortions can no longer be corrected.
