In the USA, video recordings are currently circulating in which a panel of experts around Corona Pope Anthony Fauci is discussing how the revolution in vaccine development that they consider urgently needed could finally be initiated. Spicy: These recordings are from November 2019 – so they were taken shortly before the outbreak of the so-called corona pandemic.
by Vanessa Renner
Fact checker are already rotating and trying to dismiss all conclusions of alternative media about video as nonsense. They are right on one point: to claim that Fauci and staff at the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are openly planning to release a new virus somewhere in China to enforce compulsory mRNA vaccination is nonsense. But that doesn’t make the recordings any less explosive. Because they explain in detail why any form of novel virus is more than convenient for these people, to put it in a friendly way, to carry out their questionable plans.
The development of a universal flu vaccine
The video in question was released by the Milken Institute on November 23, 2019 under the title “Making Influenza History: The Quest for a Universal Vaccine”Uploaded to YouTube. Present at the panel were moderator and journalist Michael Specter, Anthony Fauci, HHS staff and director of the Department of Advanced Biomedical Research and Development Rick Bright, Bruce Gellin from the Sabin Vaccine Institute, former FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and Casey Wright from “ Flu Lab ”.
The description of the video is already more than telling – here translated into German:
Right now, there is no greater threat to global health, safety and economy than the emergence of a highly transmissible influenza virus that could trigger the next global pandemic. Still, we have become complacent about the threat of flu. The annual event, dubbed “cold and flu season” by the media, has created the impression that flu is inevitable. New treatments and improved diagnostics will improve our influenza management. Above all, we need a better vaccine to prevent the annual losses – and a vaccine that will be available before the next pandemic strikest. Philanthropists, governments, and the private sector have come together to invest in breakthrough science and catalyze a global response to the inevitable next pandemic of influenza. But are we organized to use today’s science and technology to the full to find an effective universal flu vaccine?
People don’t fear the flu enough
So it’s about pushing the development of a new, “better” flu vaccine. In particular, this vaccine is said to be effective against all strains of influenza. But that is, according to those present, difficult: Industry and science are not exhausting their capacities, if one finds – and also strongly criticizes the calm attitude of the population towards the flu. Moderator Michael Specter openly complains that a successful promotion of the flu vaccination is hardly possible and opens the debate with the following question: Why are we so bad at protecting ourselves from the virus that is probably doing the most harm to humanity?
All those present agree that influenza is a massive threat – exactly as it is claimed by SARS-CoV-2 to the population today. Only the citizen is obviously too underexposed to recognize the danger as such – and thus outrageously contributes a large part to slowing down the development of better vaccine technologies.
At this point, of course, everyone can ask themselves the question: Do these people just want our best after all? Anthony Fauci is not only known for disgusting experiments that make the Nazi doctor Mengele appear like a philanthropist, but has also never made a secret of the fact that he regards the highly dangerous manipulation of viruses in the laboratory as “worth a pandemic”. “Research” has always been about health protection. It has long been proven that Fauci and his authority promoted and promoted the corona experiments in the Wuhan laboratory. Against this background, every reader should form their own judgment about how philanthropic and concerned with the well-being of humanity the American Corona Pope actually is.
Everyone in the panel obviously has the conviction that the world’s population is made up of underage, stubborn people who should be forced to be happy. Fauci says literally: “There is no one who is afraid of the flu. It is a misconception that it is not a serious illness. “ And he says:
“So we really have a problem with how the world perceives influenza and it’s going to be very hard to change, unless you do it from the inside out and say, ‘I don’t care what your perception is, we will Approach this problem now in a disruptive way, and iteratively, because you need both. ‘”
“Disruption”Is a word that comes up again and again in the debate. It takes a disruption, a change, to make progress in terms of vaccinations. Although the flu claims such high casualties, there is no sense of urgency (urgency). It almost gives the impression that one does not want to defeat influenza, but rather death itself: Nobody seems to want to admit that people die – and that flu viruses can contribute to it, especially from a certain age or if they have pre-existing illnesses. The human immune system is also seen as far inferior to vaccinations.
Speed instead of security
Sticking to tried and tested vaccine technologies is a thorn in the side of Fauci and the other participants. While new developments could mean good things for medicine and thus also for mankind, the panel complains about one thing above all: slowness. The word “security”, on the other hand, is never used in the mouth.
Moderator Michael Specter raised the question early on whether the system could not simply be “blown up”. Stick to technologies from 70 years ago, even though there have been so many innovations since then.
I mean, of course, we can’t just turn the tap on our system and then say, hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine that we haven’t given anyone before. But it has to work somehow.
Rick Bright, director of the agency for advanced biomedical research and development, points out that Thanks to mRNA technology, new vaccines can be developed at lightning speed and distributed globally:
It’s not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could be happening somewhere in China, we could get the RNA sequence from it, broadcast it to a number of regional centers, if not locally, if not at your home at some point , and then print those vaccines on a patch and give yourself.
This statement is not a plan to release a virus, but Bright is explaining what could already be possible – if science were allowed and if industry were to use and test the new technologies. In fact, over the course of the year, companies have to be encouraged to take more risks in the development of new vaccines – funding should be made loose for this purpose. The fact that in the end not only the companies take a risk by testing new technologies, but also those who receive the experimental vaccines have to live with higher risks, is of course ignored. Instead, Fauci complains verbatim at one point that the extensive testing of vaccines in the form of phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical studies would take a good ten years. Obviously, he is not at all interested in the fact that these tests serve to guarantee the safety of the vaccine.
The moderator even lets himself be carried away to the question, whether it would not have been better for humanity if the 2009 swine flu “pandemic” had been worse. Fauci denies this after a long pause. In fact, a vaccine was launched on the market relatively quickly in 2009 – with serious side effects. The latter are not mentioned in the conversation.
Construction plan of the corona “pandemic”
Even if the video does not show any concrete plans to “release” a new virus: The overall construction plan for the corona “pandemic” including the vaccination campaign can be read from the discussion. People should be afraid and feel threatened, there had to be a feeling of absolute urgency to push through a long-awaited paradigm shift in vaccine development – away from a precise testing of the safety of a preparation towards rapidly whipped through mass vaccinations with experimental technologies.
The fear of influenza that never wanted to arise was fueled in a downright absurd way in the context of the corona crisis – although the level of threat based on current data was always similar. The human immune system has now proven to be far superior to vaccinations. However, the population was so pressured by consistent fear propaganda that they initially accepted the experimental vaccines in large parts without much grumbling. The expected damage from this questionable vaccination campaign was never relevant: An Anthony Fauci, who for the sake of alleged “progress” carries out experiments to increase the danger of viruses and willingly puts human lives at risk, obviously does not care about the consequences of his actions for them Population.